Terence Snead: Welcome reporters.
Photographers. Friends. If you’ll all please take your seats, I know
there are a lot of questions you’d like to ask and we’ll be happy to answer as
many as time allows.
Thank
you.
Again,
welcome. I believe our panel needs no
introduction. It seems like just
yesterday we were all crowded into this very same lecture room waiting for the
big unveiling of the Effigy of Quetzalcoatl, the extraordinary artifact
discovered in the EFFIGY project directed by author Theresa Danley. I’m pleased that we are brought together
again with the fortunate recovery of the artifact after it had been stolen ten
days ago. So without further adieu, I
once again give you our very own expert in Mesoamerican Archaeoastronomy and
emeritus professor, Dr. John Friedman, professor of Southwestern anthropology, Dr. Anthony Peet,
and anthropology student, Lori Dewson.
Gentlemen
–
Tribune Reporter: Dr. Peet –
Peet: Please, just call me Peet.
Tribune Reporter: Certainly, Peet.
Some are comparing the discovery of the Effigy to that of King Tut’s
golden mask. As the archaeologist who
discovered the Effigy of Quetzalcoatl, how do you view this discovery?
Peet: Actually, I should refer that question to Lori. She was the one who first discovered it. I just led the excavation.
Tribune Reporter: Of course.
Miss Dewson, is the discovery of the Effigy comparable to King Tut’s
golden mask?
Lori: Well, it is flattering to see all the attention the Effigy is
receiving. I think the fact that such a
beautiful artifact was discovered in the southwest really captures the public
attention and who can resist a good mystery presented by the questions we have
yet to answer?
Tribune Reporter: What kind of questions?
Lori: We’d all love to know for sure how a Mesoamerican artifact
from central Mexico came to be interred in an Anasazi grave here in the
southwest. But what we currently know
about the Effigy and where it came from is on the blog link at www.theresadanley.com.
Channel 6 Reporter: Dr. Peet.
How was an artifact as valuable as the Effigy stolen from the University
of Utah campus?
Peet: The theft resulted in an unfortunate chain of events that
just happened to work in the thief’s favor.
Tribune Reporter: But wasn’t the Effigy supposed to be stored in
the Museum of Natural History?
Peet: That is correct. However,
the Effigy was removed from the museum for further study and it was from the
lab that it was taken.
Modern Archaeology Freelancer:
What’s left to study? All the scientists
in the field agree that the Effigy was taken out of Mexico and traded to the
Southwestern Anasazi. Isn’t that
correct, Dr. Friedman?
John: Yes. At least that is
the conclusion I have arrived at.
Lori: However, there is still room for other interpretations. It’s too early to say for certain how the
Effigy was found in Utah.
Modern Archaeology Freelancer: What kind of interpretations?
Lori: Well, that’s what I was working on as part of my Master’s
dissertation when the Effigy was stolen from the lab.
Tribune Reporter: Dr. Peet, when did you discover the Effigy
missing?
Peet: The night of the theft.
Channel 6 Reporter: How did you know the Effigy was taken back to
Mexico?
Peet: Well, there were clues left behind. With John’s help, we were able to decipher
the thief’s motives and trace the Effigy to Mexico. However, that’s where things became
complicated by a third party.
Channel 6 Reporter: So the theft was nothing more than a scheme to
sell the Effigy on the black market.
Peet: No. It was a much
deadlier game than that.
Tribune Reporter: Are you implying there was a murder?
John: Actually, we’re not allowed to discuss the details of the
crime until the Mexican AFI and the FBI have concluded their investigations.
Modern Archaeology Freelancer: Is it true you recovered the Effigy
somewhere in the ruins of Teotihuacan?
John: We found clues in Teotihuacan that led us to the Toltec ruins
of Tula. The hunt for the Effigy
inadvertently gave us a tour of central Mexico’s most impressive sites.
Modern Archaeology Freelancer: Why had the thief chosen to take the
Effigy to an archaeological site?
John: Tula is the ancient site where thousands of years of
astronomical observations shaped the theology and mythology around the Effigy
of Quetzalcoatl. It all had to do with
ancient projections of time and belief.
Tribune Reporter: Ancient projections of time?
John: The ancient Toltec calendar and cosmology were the basis of
the thief’s motive. Unfortunately, I
cannot share more than that at this time.
Channel 6 Reporter: Where is the Effigy now?
John: That is classified at the moment.
Lori: But rest assured it is safe.
Besides, what are the chances it’ll get stolen twice?
Theresa Danley’s
interest in history, science and adventure all come together in
her action-packed archaeological thrillers. Her explosive adventures
explore the impacts ancient mythologies can have on modern ideologies,
extracting answers to the unknown and mysterious through heart-pounding,
edge-of-your-seat suspense.
Theresa began linking the realms of the ancient world with the present in 2010 with the publication of her first thriller, Effigy. Now, the journey continues with the coming release of Deity (July 2012), and the third book which is currently in the works.
Theresa began linking the realms of the ancient world with the present in 2010 with the publication of her first thriller, Effigy. Now, the journey continues with the coming release of Deity (July 2012), and the third book which is currently in the works.
Theresa lives
along the hi-line of Montana where she keeps busy raising her family,
riding her horses and entertaining her imagination with writing and
research.
Thanks for the fun character interview, Theresa!
ReplyDeleteCate
Ooohhhh...this sounds really great. I adore this interview by the reporters. Very neat.
ReplyDeleteI love thrillers with archeology as part of the story. I envy authors who get to ride horses too.
ReplyDelete